Most of you have probably heard of the concept of multiple dimensions,
even if only from science fiction movies. In nearly all cases of Sci-Fi stories
involving multiple dimensions, the main point is that the other world is
exactly the same except for a few slight differences. These differences usually
consist of certain things being different colors than in our own, or certain
characters roles and personalities being completely reversed. But did you ever
stop to think why?
Some stories explain this by mentioning that the hero was
put through a traumatic event that turned him evil, or some other such nonsense.
The problem is that why did the event that happened in the parallel world not occur
in the main world? This can be explained by cause and effect. Certain past events
did/did not take place in order for the main event to take place. Of course,
one would have to wonder what caused those events to/not to take place in the
first place. In order for ONE thing to change, thousands to millions to
billions of other things would have to change prior.
It all goes back to the Point of Origin theory. I only call
it a theory because it is absolutely impossible to prove. However, it is completely
valid, and entirely true. The Point of Origin Theory states that the position of
all existing matter in the universe at the beginning of time predetermined all
of eternity. So the only difference between the multiple dimensions mentioned above, is the first instance in time.
This may sound rather absurd, until you think about it from a non-linear timeline perspective. Instead of viewing time like a line going from origin to eternity, think of it like a single string that is so thoroughly knotted that all parts of the string are touching all at once. All points affect all other points, but only going in one direction along the string. Through cause and effect, all matter interacts in one way or another. This is similar to The Butterfly Effect, only far more realistic. The concept that the wind of the butterfly’s wings can cause a hurricane on the other side of the world, is not only ridiculous, but breaks the Laws of Thermodynamics. However, the Point of Origin is much more realistic. Instead of one tiny event causing drastic, huge events, it is a series of billions of events all coming together in a magnificent orchestra that is eternity.
This may sound rather absurd, until you think about it from a non-linear timeline perspective. Instead of viewing time like a line going from origin to eternity, think of it like a single string that is so thoroughly knotted that all parts of the string are touching all at once. All points affect all other points, but only going in one direction along the string. Through cause and effect, all matter interacts in one way or another. This is similar to The Butterfly Effect, only far more realistic. The concept that the wind of the butterfly’s wings can cause a hurricane on the other side of the world, is not only ridiculous, but breaks the Laws of Thermodynamics. However, the Point of Origin is much more realistic. Instead of one tiny event causing drastic, huge events, it is a series of billions of events all coming together in a magnificent orchestra that is eternity.
Kind of like that, only bigger. and more complex.
Of course, all of this is to say that every decision you
have ever made, or ever will make, had been predetermined by God since before Creation
began. Most of you are probably scoffing right now, especially if you know your
Theology. I would guess that you are thinking something along the lines of, “What
on earth are you talking about, guy!? If God already decided what we are going
to do, then we don’t have free will, the entire point of Him creating us!” And
you would be right. Along with this, as my Stepfather pointed out when
overhearing me discuss this concept with my mother, it would also present a
serious problem with spiritual accountability. If everything we do is
predestined, and we have no true choice in our actions, then why should we be
held accountable for our sins? These are all wonderfully valid points that I
honestly have no answer to. However, I would ask you to NOT read that last
sentence and say, “Well this guy clearly has no idea what he is talking about.”
Because I do. The problem is that these are two factual concepts that are at opposition
to each other. Once again, I can hear your voice through time, space, and the
internet, “But not everything I do is controlled by cause and effect! What about RANDOMNESS!? The actual definition of random is to not have a reason or cause!”
But you would be wrong. Even things that are completely and entirely “random”
have a predetermining factor(s) behind them. Even if you never know what the
reasons are, they are still there.
I would like you to do something. Spout off a list of 5 or so completely random words. Now.
Now take a minute to think about what words you picked. These
words are things that just popped into your head seemingly for no reason
whatsoever. But there is a reason you thought of those words. Most likely, they
convey concepts of emotions, recent personal events, things you can see right now,
or things that you like in general. Or, if you were particularly clever, and
saw though my trap, you probably spouted off nonsense words that don’t exist,
there is a reason that you made those noises. Most likely because they were the
most comfortable noises to make. Now that is another subject entirely that I
will not delve into.
The point is that no matter what you say or do, there is a
reason for it. 99% of the time, you will never even know what it is, or that
there is a reason at all. But there is. And there is a reason that that reason
exists. And another for that reason, so on and so forth to the beginning of
time. If you really want to track down the cause and effect, think about this; you
see a person walking up to the door you are about to go through. Do you walk
through the door and leave, or hold it open for them? This entirely depends on
several factors, a few of which are, your age, the person’s age, how your
parents raised you, your relationship with your parents, your relationship with
the person, your gender, the person’s gender, ext. But let’s just take a look at one factor:
How your parents raised you. If you are a boy, and your dad if from the south,
you would probably hold the door, especially if the other person if female. Why is that? Why did your dad raise you to
hold doors open for females? The obvious answer is that it is polite; the not
so obvious answer is because that is how his dad probably raised him. But why did his dad raise him that way? Well,
because his dad probably raised him that way too. And so on and so forth.
The problem is that at some point somebody’s father had to
have not taught his son to open doors for females. So when and why did it start?
Well that would be what is called a cultural concept. It is a concept that is
developed by an entire culture conjunctively.
Go figure. The concept was that women were special, and needed to be
treated better than men. This is commonly misunderstood as women being weaker
than men, but it is definitely not true. Well why did they think that? It comes from a
verse in the Bible. “Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to
knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being
heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.” 1Pet
3:7 KJV. At first glance, it does seem to call women weaker than and not as
good as men, but that is not what it is saying. What it means is that women are
more like fine china, compared to men who are more like camping ware. So it is
not insulting women in any way whatsoever, it is telling husbands to take
special care of their wives. So people
looked at that verse, and decided that young men should be taught to treat all
women with respect as they should their wife, so they started raising them at a
young age, to do little things for females such as open doors, out of respect.
So if you are said boy, who would open the door for the person, and you have
never even opened a Bible, you were in fact performing a habit that was
predetermined from the moment that the scripture was written. Cause and Effect.
To be honest, it does not make any difference to me whether
you agree with the Point of Origin theory or not. It makes no difference
whatsoever in the grand scheme of things. Do you know why? Because God already
decided whether or not you would agree with it. This brings us back to the
contradicting facts of accountability and freewill. What you need to understand
is that God in omnipotent. Omnipotent means all powerful, for those of you who
do not know. A being without limits can do whatever he wants, and understands
things we can never grasp. At some point, we need to simply stop trying to explain
and just accept.